The Origin And Future Of Our Ever-Inc... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Moral Group Discussion » Drugs » The Origin And Future Of Our Ever-Increasing Drug Usage « Previous Next »
Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Karl Loren
Moderator
Username: Kloren

Post Number: 8
Registered: 05-2003
Posted on Monday, May 19, 2003 - 04:44 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

By the 1960s the elite in America began to fall into the clutches of these mind-altering arguments, when, for instance, Henry Luce, publisher of both Time and Life started promoting LSD publicly.

The media, notably LIFE magazine, whose publisher Henry Luce tried the drug, ran articles promoting it. A March 1963 article claimed that LSD was “derived from a natural product.”

See the below link for the page for the entire reference:

LSD Becomes Popularized.

Those who wanted to flood these delitating drugs into the American culture also wanted to have a military that was clean of LSD and could fight any external enemies that might come along.

A friend of mine entered a top-secret post in the military in those years, and described to me the secret training films that showed ordinary soldiers (released from military prisons if they agreed to take LSD and to do this experiment) would run an obstacle track, as normal soldiers. Then these same men would take LSD, and start the same obstacle track. One of the first "obstacles" was a low mound of dirt across the street -- they had only to run up the street and jump over the dirt.

Not one of the LSD implanted soldiers made it over the first mound of dirt -- and of course never did any more of the obstacle course.

The secret film was shown to these top, highly cleared, military men so that they would NOT count on drugged troops to defend America.

Yet Henry Luce and many media giants were promoting that LSD was a necessary substance for the creative artist -- and so they targeted Hollywood. Hollywood has been high on drugs ever since.

There is still a terrible myth floating around Hollywood that only a "crazy" person can be a brilliant artist!

Gradually the harm done by LSD became better known, and "better drugs" were eagerly sought.

After all, the mind-altering action of LSD was easily proven, so the Hollywood types and others now wanted a mind-altering drug that did not have so many had side effects.

That was about the time when cocaine started becoming the "gentlemen's recreational substance" and the big magazines were talking about this as non-harmful, weekend recreation.

Literally millions of Americans got addicted to this or that drug, including, by 1988, one of the first of the so-called "legal" addictive drugs -- Prozac.

Up to that time those who wanted to calm down, without a drug, were often using a simple amino acid found in large supply within turkey -- tryptophan. It was easily available in health food stores, never any dangers connected with it, and often used to help people sleep, or relax.

Then, in one fateful month, March, 1990, the media (which led all the drug flooding of America) praised the wonders of Prozac at the same time as the FDA invented an excuse to remove tryptophan from the market!

In the fall of 1989, the FDA recalled L-Tryptophan, an amino acid nutritional supplement, stating that it caused a rare and deadly flu-like condition (Eosinophilia-Myalgia Syndrome - EMS). On March 22, 1990, the FDA banned the public sale dietary of L-Tryptophan completely. This ban continues today. On March 26, 1990, "Newsweek" featured a lead article praising the virtues of the anti-depressant drug Prozac. Its multi-color cover displayed a floating, gigantic green and white capsule of Prozac with the caption: "Prozac: A Breakthrough drug for Depression."

So Prozac sales soared, cocaine became a terrible illegal drug, and tryptophan was no longer available.

Do you remember 1990?

Bill Clinton was elected to complete the dump of morality in America -- the drug craze just made it easier for the "me-too generation" to have the sex in the Oval Office, even if only through their hero, Bill.

Times have changed. We have a war on drugs, but it is rather well recognized that we have lost and will continue to lose that war -- drug use continues to increase.

The final blow would be a court ruling, probably under the Americans With Disabilities Act, that it is discriminatory and illegal to refuse to hire, or to fire, any person taking any street drug, or Prozac, for instance.

The so-called legal drug market is well positioned now, to completely take over the illegal drug craze in America, even if illegal drugs are somewhat reduced (by some mistake)!

Let me speak, somewhat hypothetically, of a drug company, let's call it "Johnson & Johnson." They decide that they will get a new drug patented and approved by the FDA for pain relief. They know that this drug is addictive and causes seizures, but they hide those results and get the patent and the FDA approval.

Remember that I ALLEGE this to be true -- I cannot prove it!

Then they carefully market this new approved drug through channels so that you would never know that Johnson & Johnson has anything to do with it. The web site doesn't mention Johnson & Johnson unless you go to the end of a long file, in the tiny print.


SEE NEXT THREAD For Conclusion




Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Karl Loren
Moderator
Username: Kloren

Post Number: 9
Registered: 05-2003
Posted on Monday, May 19, 2003 - 05:00 pm:   Edit Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Second Thread

In due course, just as they knew would happen, the FDA issues a warning letter -- saying this drug is addictive and tells doctors that it can only be prescribed in those cases where the patient has no chance of becoming addicted.

Source: click

Sales in the US plummet.

Let's call this drug "Ultram." You can find it being prescribed even now. It is real and it is addictive. Druggies use it!

No problem! In the mean time, through other channels, using different business names, they start selling Ultram in very large quantities into certain foreign countries -- the buyers have agreed that they will NOT sell it in the country that imports the stuff, since that would cause the equivalent of the FDA there to outlaw it.

If you go to the official Johnson & Johnson web site you will look in vain for Ultram! It is there, somewhere, but certainly not easy to find.

If you do find it on the official web site, you will probably find a disclaimer:

ULTRAM® - Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc.

In order for you to get the most complete and current information on the brand you have selected, we invite you to visit the brand Web sites listed below. By clicking on a link you will leave the Johnson & Johnson Corporate site, jnj.com, and be directed to one of our operating company Web sites with all the information you need on the product you chose.

There is a link that takes you to:

www.ultram.com - Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc.

Information, official, about Ultram, from Ortho-McNeil is on THIS PAGE on another web site.

The addictive Ultram slides silently into Germany, for instance, to a few large companies that sell ONLY on the internet. They specialize in selling drugs like this without any prescription required, to consumers in the United States who know about this "legal" method of buying prescription drugs, without a prescription, as long as they are purchased for personal use.

Johnson & Johnson is selling, legally, to a recognized firm in Germany, and that firm is selling, without violating any German laws, and being immune from US laws, to private US consumers. These private US consumers receive their packages in guaranteed "un marked" packages.

They have even found a way to ship into a US address (the shipping documents show the German origin). From this US address, probably in Texas, a "re-distribution company simply takes the small packages out of the big package, puts US postage on them, and sends them on to the US person. He has his drugs "from a foreign source" and the Texas company is NOT selling them to the US Person.

Yet another company, with a US address, and a credit-card processing service, receives the orders for this "foreign-source drug," and processes the credit card. This other US company, probably in New Jersey, does NOT sell any drugs to anyone.

They simply have a contract to process credit card orders FOR the company in Germany. Depending on the tax situation, the money is sent somewhere that escapes taxes from any country, and the German company SELLS the drugs to the US Consumer, even putting them in a package individually addressed to that US consumer, and then ships them off in the large package ("to save shipping costs") to the Texas firm that "re-distributes" them.

I've presented the practical way this works. There are differences of opinion on the legality of parts of this, but the bottom line is that it is up to the FDA to do something to stop it, and they are not about to:

"Everything coming into this country (via mail) is in violation," said a senior FDA official, asking to remain anonymous, about the importation of medications from abroad.

But in the meanwhile, the FDA has no intention of busting the seniors using the service, the official told United Press International.


source



Nevertheless, mail-order for prescription (imported) drugs has increased sixfold, from about $4.5 billion in 1992 to about $27.5 billion in 2001.

source.
And, here is more information.

Click here
The so-called US consumer may have already collected some money from a group of "other" US people, each of whom is waiting for "HIS" delivery of this addictive and deadly drug. He paid in currency, and there is no receipt. This addictive, deadly drug is "dropped off" at the proper address for this "other" US person -- who has obtained his addictive and deadly drug, paying in currency to someone who has no business address -- you could call him a "street drug pusher" if you wanted to be honest about this.

In the mean time Johnson & Johnson has found a crooked way to hide the sale of Ultram to the Germany buyer so that this whole soup never sees the light of day!

I allege that not only Johnson & Johnson does this, but so do virtually all the other drug companies. They deliberately create an addictive drug to sell to US drug addicts through this legal loop hole. The addictive drug is called "OK" because it is not a street drug, but is an "artificial" opiate!

It happens. Is Johnson & Johnson guilty of illegal drug pushing? Of course not! Are thousands of people in the US getting this harmful and addictive drug anyway? You bet they are!

You don't believe it? CLICK HERE to read about Ultram, and to see the exact web offer to sell you Ultram without a prescription!

I, Karl Loren have mounted a campaign to expose the drug companies that produce harmful drugs at obscene profits. I invite you to join in this campaign.

"I accuse drug companies of preferring profits over prevention; success over saving lives; money over morality; cunning over cure!" Source

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Post as "Anonymous"
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:
Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration