Home Page

Initial World View Discussion Threads -- Read and/or Post News Items
  Membership What Is A Moral Group? Direct Islam Thread Islam News

Indian Hindu Seer Hits A Blind Spot

Source

HindustanTimes.com Home

HindustanTimes.com Home

Seer hits a blind spot

July 7, 2003

The failure of the negotiations between the Kanchi Shankaracharya and the Muslim Personal Law Board on the Ayodhya dispute is regrettable for more reasons than one.

[Karl Note:  "Shankaracharya" is one of the top spiritual leaders in India. Click here for more on him, story below.]

First, it means that this particular route for solving the problem will have to be abandoned for the time being since it will be difficult for the two sides to resume talking till their present differences are narrowed down. Second, the failure has understandably generated a feeling of being let down on both sides.

This, in itself, is a matter of concern since the setback can be cynically exploited to show one side or the other in poor light. Already, the Muslim institution is being blamed by the VHP for frustrating the Shankaracharya’s efforts. However, true to its way of functioning, the VHP is conveniently ignoring its earlier observations casting doubts on the very process of negotiations.

A third reason for disquiet is the belief that the failure will embolden the hardliners. Indeed, the Shankara-charya’s reference to the Varanasi and Mathura shrines has led to a widening of the Ayodhya dispute to include these two sites. This is obviously a new complicating factor so far as future talks are concerned, for it will not be easy for future negotiators to delink Ayodhya from the two other shrines. Although the BJP still insists that Varanasi and Mathura are not ‘on its agenda’, the RSS and the VHP are now bound to become even more aggressive in their demand for the acquisition of all the three sites.

The lesson to be drawn from the present failure is that no negotiations should be started unless there are signs of a convergence of views on at least one or two crucial points. Otherwise, a setback only vitiates the atmosphere.

Obviously, good intentions alone are not enough, especially when the sense of mistrust is so high. It is precisely for this reason that a judicial pronouncement has always been regarded as the best option. Although it is bound to disappoint one of the two parties to the dispute, the loser will have no alternative but to accept the verdict. Negotiations, on the other hand, can only succeed in an atmosphere of goodwill which, unfortunately, is conspicuous by its absence at present.


Source

HindustanTimes.com Home

 

Ayodhya failure casts a shadow on Shankaracharya

Indo-Asian News Service
New Delhi, July 11
Why does the Shankaracharya, one of Hinduism's most respected spiritual leaders, dabble in politics?

Days after his attempts to mediate in the temple-mosque row in Ayodhya collapsed, more and more people are openly asking - just why does Shankaracharya Jayendra Saraswati hobnob with politicians at all?

Said a young Tamil woman professional who comes from a deeply religious Hindu family: "It is so disheartening to see the learned Shankaracharya visibly happy in the company of VIPs. Is he behaving like a man of religion?"

Asked an officer of Andhra Bank whose family literally worships the 'mutt' at Kancheepuram in Tamil Nadu where the Shankaracharya is based: "Why is he always seen in the company of politicians?"

On Wednesday, former prime minister Chandra Shekhar became the first high-profile personality to hit out at the Hindu pontiff, accusing him of acting like a politician.

"The seer should not have got immersed in politics," Chandra Shekhar said, adding this was the reason why his attempts to resolve the Ayodhya dispute ended in failure last week.

On June 6, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board rejected a proposal by the Shankaracharya calling upon Muslims to "gift" the site of the razed Babri mosque in Ayodhya for a Hindu temple and the community to prepare to give up ownership of two other historic mosques - at Varanasi and Mathura.

Muslim leaders who were initially hopeful that the pontiff's intervention might help resolve what has become one of the most intractable problems of independent India expressed disgust at the approach of the pontiff.

They were also taken aback - because earlier newspaper accounts of his "formula" indicated he had taken into account the sensibilities of both communities and had tried to avoid contentious issues. Hindu groups that tore down the Babri mosque are determined to build a grand temple at the site. Muslim leaders say they are not against the temple but want the mosque to be rebuilt too.

Once the "formula" came unstuck, Muslim leaders accused the Shankaracharya of merely echoing a long-standing demand of Hindu rightwing groups such as the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP).

Predictably -- and for the first time -- the Shankaracharya came under attack from a host of newspapers that complained that he displayed a Hindu bias instead of being even-handed.

Indeed, just before his idea was rejected on July 6, an opinion poll by a newsmagazine showed that more Hindus and more Muslims were confident the pontiff might succeed where so many others have failed.

Many even said the Shankaracharya - who receives a constant stream of high-profile politicians and is very often photographed in the company of VIPs -- was eminently suited to be a peacemaker.

Now, many are finding fault with the seer, who heads one of the most sacred seats of Hindu religion and is seen by his admirers to be the 69th successor to the Adi Shankara, the pre-eminent Hindu seer who lived about 2,500 years ago...

Although the Shankaracharya has always favoured a temple for Hindu god Ram at the site of the destroyed Babri mosque and although he has been always at ease in the company of groups such as VHP, he never appeared to share their seeming religious intolerance of all things Islam.

His own complex in Kancheepuram, a small town near Chennai popular for silk saris, shares a wall with a 300-year-old mosque and there has never been even a hint of a quarrel between the two.

The Shankaracharya's predecessor launched the practice of maintaining silence when Muslims prayed at the mosque. The practice continues. Many Muslims come to seek blessings from the Shankaracharya.

No wonder, the Shankaracharya's failure to respect the ordinary Muslim sentiments as he set out to find a mediated solution to the Ayodhya has caused a lot of disappointment. Even many among his followers admit that.

 

         
Home Page Table Of Contents Discussion Threads Membership Copyright Notice