![]() |
Initial World View | Discussion Threads -- Read and/or Post | News Items | |
| Membership | What Is A Moral Group? | Direct Hillary Thread | Hillary Clinton News |
Hillary’s Vast-Right Wing Conspiracy Didn’t Do It
Hillary’s
Vast-Right Wing Conspiracy Didn’t Do It
June 4, 2003
![]()
For $8 mil you’d think one would get some secrets out of Hillary’s new book and
not just a regurgitation of stuff nobody believed when they heard it five years
ago. A caller asked a very good question about this on Wednesday. You won't find
the answer in the book, but I have it right here.
Hillary explained that Der Schlick was just trying to “protect” her from
learning about the Oval Orifice trysts with Monica. (What a great guy!)
This, she says, explains why - despite being the smartest woman ever to nibble
on a Blimpie - she was the last to learn about the affair. Incredulous? So was
the caller who asked how Bill Clinton was protecting Hillary by sending her on
the Today Show to blame everything on a vast right-wing conspiracy. Imagine
letting your wife to go on national TV to defend your honor when you know she's
making a fool of herself - and then saying, "I did it for you, baby."
This question led me to roll Hillary's claims about the VRW in the audio link
below, and reminded me of this from NRO's Ramesh Ponnuru on the Today interview:
"If the story about the president having an affair and lying about it were
'proven true,' (Mrs. Clinton) said, it 'would be a very serious offense.' She
added, 'That is not going to be proven true.' Twice, she used the construction
'proven true.' Are those really the words that you would pick if you were
convinced of your husband's innocence?" The point is they all knew the Lewinsky
story was true and this was just the beginning of the clever deflection to their
favorite bogeymen: the right-wing Clinton-haters.
Bush-Haters Far, Far Surpass Any Clinton-Hate
![]()
June 4, 2003
![]()
The latest Gallup poll shows the Democratic Party's efforts to paint Bush as
having "lied" about Hussein's WMD program, and to therefore claim the war to
liberate Iraq was unjustified, has failed. (See:
Gallup: No WMD, No Prob) This is devastating news
to you Bush-haters - and you know who you are. I'm here to officially say hatred
for Bush on the left has far surpassed whatever hatred there was for Bill
Clinton on the right. You people are losing it, and I have the vitriolic e-mails
to prove it.
![]()
There is a war going on in this country that, politically, mirrors the
Israel-Palestine situation. You can hear it when I welcome liberals to my
program. They do not care for facts or reason. Their obsession with Bush is
destroying their lives, just as it destroys everyone who hates. They're foaming
at the mouth! They resent anything positive that happens for America because of
the man in the White House! Now, I'm not denying for a minute that there was
hatred for Clinton. I didn't harbor any hatred for the guy. I don't hate
anybody. It's not productive. I'm a man of love and peace.
I always said he'd be a fun guy to chase women or watch a ballgame with. I just
didn't want him as president. But I am here to tell you that where there was
hatred for Clinton on the right, it has been forever surpassed by hatred for
Bush on the left. This hatred goes from the top of the ivory towers of
intellectual academe, all the way down to the lowest depths in raunchy places
like Ted Kaczynski's shack. The hate covers the whole economic spectrum. There
is abject, total hatred, and it has officially exceeded this week any similar
dislike for Bill Clinton on the right after only two years of the Bush
presidency.
Wow. That's really something.
| Home Page | Table Of Contents | Discussion Threads | Membership | Copyright Notice |