Home Page

Initial World View Discussion Threads -- Read and/or Post News Items
  Membership What Is A Moral Group? Direct Bush Thread President Bush News

President Bush Speaks On July 4th and 5th!

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT AT 4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION AND 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF FLIGHT

Our nation is still at war. The enemies of America plot against us. And many of our fellow citizens are still serving and sacrificing and facing danger in distant places. Many military families are separated. Our people in uniform do not have easy duty, and much depends on their success. Without America's active involvement in the world, the ambitions of tyrants would go unopposed, and millions would live at the mercy of terrorists. With Americans' active involvement in the world, tyrants learn to fear, and terrorists are on the run.

Bush's 'bring 'em on' challenge to Iraqi foes draws ire on Hill

WASHINGTON -- President Bush yesterday adopted a defiant tone against outlaw elements in Iraq, virtually daring them to continue their deadly attacks on U.S. troops and vowing to stay and fight.

"There are some who feel like that, you know, the conditions are such that they can attack us there," Bush told reporters at the White House. "My answer is, 'Bring 'em on.'

"Bring 'Em On?"

Yesterday, when I read that US Commander-in-Chief George W. Bush, in a moment of blustering arm-chair machismo, sent a message to the 'non-existent' Iraqi guerrillas to "bring 'em on," the first image in my mind was a 20-year-old soldier in an ever-more-fragile marriage, who'd been away from home for 8 months.

Bush to foes in Baghdad: 'Bring'em on!'

President George W. Bush vowed that strikes on U.S.-led forces in Iraq would not lead the United States to "leave prematurely" and defiantly challenged any foes in the war-torn nation to attack US troops.

"There are some who feel like that, you know, the conditions are such that they can attack us there. My answer is, bring'em on!," he said. "We've got the force necessary to deal with the security situation."

Bring ‘em on, but we need Indian troops!

Responding to the regular trickle of unpleasant news from Iraq, he challenged the Iraqi fighters with the menacing expression: “Bring ‘em on”.

. . . .

The Democrats got the message but did not like it. Even at the risk of being called cowards and unpatriotic, some of them criticised President Bush. One said Bush’s words were “tantamount to inciting and inviting more attacks against the US forces.”

Senator Frank Lautenberg said: “When I served in the army is Europe during World War II, I never heard any military commander — let alone a commander in chief — invite enemies to attack US troops.”

Bush invites ire for taunts to Iraqi fighters

In language that echoed some of the slangy expressions he has used before, a testy Bush extended his hand and challenged "bring 'em on," while asserting that US forces in Iraq are "plenty tough" to deal with the persistent attacks that have claimed scores of American troops since the war ended.  

Reagan: Stop trashing America

The fact is, we are being shot at, people are killing us, and we need to go in and deal with the problem. Yet the Democrats went bonkers when President Bush said Wednesday that "Anybody who wants to harm American troops will be found and brought to justice. There are some that feel like if they attack us that we may decide to leave prematurely. They don't understand what they are talking about if that is the case. Let me finish. There are some who feel like the conditions are such that they can attack us there. My answer is: "Bring 'em on.""


Source

THE WHITE HOUSE

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT AT 4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION AND 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF FLIGHT

United States Air Force Museum Dayton, Ohio

12:13 P.M. EDT
July 4, 2003

U.S. President George W. Bush shakes hands with U.S. Air Force personnel while participating in a 4th of July holiday celebration of Inventing Flight, the centennial anniversary of the Wright brother's first flight at Kitty Hawk, N.C., while at the U.S. Air Force Museum in Dayton, Ohio, July 4, 2003. The president is scheduled to return to Washington following the holiday celebration.

Larry Downing / Reuters

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you all very much. Thanks for the warm welcome. Be seated. (Laughter.) It's kind of a long speech. (Laughter.) Thanks for coming. It's great to be in the great state of Ohio. (Applause.) I am proud to be at Wright Patt, the birthplace, the home and the future of aerospace. (Applause.)

I had the honor of meeting Amanda Wright Lane and Steve Wright, descendants of the Wright brothers. They were quick to remind me that Dayton is where the Wright brothers first drew up the plans for their flying machine. I wonder what Wilbur and Orville would have thought if they'd have seen that flying machine that I came in on today. (Laughter and applause.)

I'm truly honored to join you in celebrating the 227th anniversary of our nation's independence. (Applause.) The 4th of July, 2003, finds our country facing many challenges. And we're rising to meet them. (Applause.) Today, and every day, the people of this land are grateful for our freedom, and we are proud to call ourselves citizens of the United States of America. (Applause.)

I want to thank Governor Bob Taft and the First Lady of Ohio for their friendship and their leadership for the state of Ohio. I appreciate so very much my friends, Senator George Voinovich and Senator Mike DeWine, for coming out greet with me today and to be her with you all. They're great United States Senators. (Applause.) I want to thank Congressman Michael Turner -- (applause) -- Congressman David Hobson and Congressman John Boehner for their service to the state of Ohio. (Applause.)

I was so honored that a great American, former Senator John Glenn, and his wife, Annie, came out to say, hello at the airport, and I'm honored they are here today. I want to thank them for coming. (Applause.)

I appreciate members of the state government -- the Lieutenant Governor Jeanette Bradley is with us today; Treasurer Joe Deters, and Doug White, the Senate President. I want to thank the Mayor of the City of Dayton, Mayor McLin, for coming today, as well, and all those involved with city government.

I appreciate the generals on this base that make this fantastic base function so well, starting with Less Lyles, the Commander. (Applause.) I want to thank Brad Tillson, who is the Chairman of Inventing Flight Commission, and John Barry, who is Chairman of the Air Force Museum Foundation.

Today when I landed I had the opportunity to meet a fellow citizen named Becky Lundy.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: Yeah!

THE PRESIDENT: Somebody has heard of her. (Laughter.) Becky Lundy is the spouse of a active duty Air Force member. What makes her unique is she's a volunteer at the Family Support Center at Wright Patterson Air Force Base. She takes time out of her day to comfort those who need comfort. She understands that service to our country means helping somebody in need.

Listen, we're a strong and powerful nation because we've got a great military. But we're also strong, because we're a nation of fine hearts. Those of you are looking for some way to serve your country, go to usafreedomcorps.gov on your Internet. Look up a place to help a neighbor in need. Join the armies of compassion, just as Becky Lundy does. We are changing America one heart, one soul, one conscience at a time, and we need your help. (Applause.)

But most of all, I want to thank you all for coming today. I appreciate the families from this base and citizens from all across the state of Ohio who have come to celebrate our Independence Day. During the last year, people at this base have met hardships together. You looked out for each other. You've given strength and support to our men and women in uniform. Like military communities across the country, you have played a vital part in our nation's cause, and America is grateful. (Applause.)

Every year on this date, we take special pride in the founding generation, the men and women who waged a desperate fight to overcome tyranny and live in freedom. Centuries later, it is hard to imagine the Revolutionary War coming out any way other than it -- how it came out. Yet victory was far from certain, and came at great cost. Those brave men and women were certain only of the cause they served: the belief that freedom is the gift of God and the right of all mankind. (Applause.)

Six years passed from the fighting at Concord Bridge to the victory at Yorktown; six years of struggle and hardship for American patriots. By their courage and perseverance, the colonies became a country. The land of 13 states and fewer than four million people grew and prospered. And today, all who live in tyranny and all who yearn for freedom place their hopes in the United States of America. (Applause.)

For more than two centuries, Americans have been called to serve and sacrifice for the ideals of our founding. And the men and women of our military have never failed us. They have left many monuments along the way -- an undivided union, a liberated Europe, the rise of democracy in Asia, and the fall of an evil empire. Millions across the world are free today because of the unselfish courage of American veterans. And today we honor our veterans. (Applause.)

And today we honor the current generation of our military, which is answering the call to defend our freedom and to bring freedom to others. (Applause.) The 23,000 men and women of Wright Patt, military and civilian, have been crucial to our victories in Afghanistan and in Iraq. (Applause.)

Research done at this base has helped give America the finest Air Force in history. (Applause.) The Predator drone, which is serving us so well overseas, was developed right here. Doctors and specialists from this base cared for wounded soldiers and for wounded prisoners. Many critical medical evacuations were carried out by the skillful pilots and crews of the mighty 445th Wing of Wright Patt. (Applause.) C-141s from this base transported troops and equipment to serve in both Operation Enduring Freedom and in Operation Iraqi Freedom. And B-1 bombers supported from this base made their presence known in Baghdad, striking the dictator's regime until the regime was no more. (Applause.)

Our United States military is meeting the threats of a new era. People in ever branch of the service and thousands of Guard and reserve members called to active duty have carried out their missions with all the skill and the honor we expect of them. This nation is grateful to the men and women who wear our nation's uniform. (Applause.)

And on this 4th of July, we also remember the brave Americans we have lost. We honor each one for their courage and for their sacrifice. We think of the families who miss them so much. And we are thankful that this nation produces such fine men and women who are willing to defend us all. May God rest their souls. (Applause.)

Our nation is still at war. The enemies of America plot against us. And many of our fellow citizens are still serving and sacrificing and facing danger in distant places. Many military families are separated. Our people in uniform do not have easy duty, and much depends on their success. Without America's active involvement in the world, the ambitions of tyrants would go unopposed, and millions would live at the mercy of terrorists. With Americans' active involvement in the world, tyrants learn to fear, and terrorists are on the run. (Applause.)

By killing innocent Americans, our enemies made their intentions clear to us. And since that September day, we have made our own intentions clear to them. (Applause.) The United States will not stand by and wait for another attack, or trust in the restraint and good intentions of evil men. (Applause.) We are on the offensive against terrorists and all who support them. We will not permit any terrorist group or outlaw regime to threaten us with weapons of mass murder. We will act whenever it is necessary to protect the lives and the liberty of the American people. (Applause.)

America's work in the world does not end with the removal of grave threats. The Declaration of Independence holds a promise for all mankind. Because Americans believe that freedom is unalienable right, we value the freedom of every nation. Because we are committed to the God-given worth of every life, we work for human dignity. We protect our friends. And we raised up former enemies to be our friends.

We bring food and disaster relief to the nations of the world in times of crisis. In Africa, where I'll go next week, the United States is leading the effort to fight AIDS and save millions of lives with the healing power of medicine. (Applause.)

Just as our enemies are coming to know the strong will of America, people across the Earth are seeing the good and generous heart of America. Americans are a generous people because we realize how much we have been given. On the Fourth of July, we can be grateful for the unity of our country in meeting great challenges, for the renewal of patriotism that adversity has brought, and for the valor we have seen in those who defend the United States.

In recent events -- (applause) -- in recent events, we have learned the names of some exceptional young men and women who have shown the strength and character of America. At a hospital in Washington, I met Master Gunnery Sergeant Guadalupe Denogean, an immigrant from Mexico who has served in the Marine Corps for 25 years. In March, he was wounded in combat in Basra and sent back to America for treatment. When I asked if he had any requests, the Master Gunnery Sergeant had just two. He wanted a promotion for the Colonel who rescued him. And he wanted to be an American citizen. (Applause.)

I was there the day that Guadalupe Denogean took the oath of citizenship. From the hospital where he was recovering, this son of Mexico raised his right hand and pledged to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. He had kept -- (applause) -- he had kept that oath for decades before he took it. I'm proud to call him a fellow America. (Applause).

To be an American, whether by birth or choice, is a high privilege. (Applause.) As citizens of this good nation, we can all be proud of our heritage and confident in our future. The ideals of July 4th, 1776, still speak to all humanity. And the revolution declared that day goes on. On July the 4th, 2003, we still placed our trust in Divine Providence. We still pledge our lives and honor to freedom's defense. And we will always believe that freedom is the hope and the future of every land.

May God continue to bless the United States of America. (Applause.)

END 12:33 P.M. EDT


Source

Bush's 'bring 'em on' challenge to Iraqi foes draws ire on Hill

Thursday, July 03, 2003

BY BOB KEMPER
CHICAGO TRIBUNE

WASHINGTON -- President Bush yesterday adopted a defiant tone against outlaw elements in Iraq, virtually daring them to continue their deadly attacks on U.S. troops and vowing to stay and fight.

"There are some who feel like that, you know, the conditions are such that they can attack us there," Bush told reporters at the White House. "My answer is, 'Bring 'em on.'

Information from Our Advertisers


"We will deal with them harshly if they continue to try to bring harm to the Iraqi people."

U.S. soldiers continued to die. An Army reservist whose retirement request was denied because of Operation Iraqi Freedom, died yesterday, a day after his convoy came under attack.

First Sgt. Christopher Coffin, 51, of Kennebunk, Me., died yesterday, his sister-in-law said. Coffin's mother lives in Somerville, N.J.

Also yesterday, a U.S. Marine was killed and three others were injured while clearing mines near the south-central Iraqi city of Karbala, the U.S. military said. The cause of their deaths was not immediately released.

Bush's remarks drew an immediate rebuke from Democrats, who said the president's cowboy-style rhetoric was inviting additional attacks on U.S. forces.

"I am shaking my head in disbelief," Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) said. "When I served in the Army in Europe during World War II, I never heard any military commander -- let alone the commander-in-chief -- invite enemies to attack U.S. troops."

Rep. Dick Gephardt (D-Mo.), a Democratic candidate for president, also chastised Bush.

"I have a message for the president: Enough of the phony, macho rhetoric," Gephardt said. "We need a serious attempt to develop a postwar plan for Iraq and not more shoot-from-the-hip one-liners."

White House spokesman Ari Fleischer defended Bush's comments.

"What the president was expressing there is his confidence in the men and women of the military to handle the military mission that they still remain in the middle of," Fleischer said. "Major combat operations have ended, but, obviously, combat has not for those who are there."

Since Bush declared an end to major combat in Iraq on May 1, 67 Americans have died there, about a third of them in fighting.

Bush said yesterday that U.S. forces would remain in Iraq as long as it takes to establish peace and set the nation on the path to democracy. On Tuesday, the president acknowledged that such a mission would be "massive and long-term."

"There are some who feel like that if they attack us that we may decide to leave prematurely," Bush said. "They don't understand what they're talking about, if that's the case."

Bush said the United States, with 156,000 troops in Iraq, has "the force necessary to deal with the security situation" but added that he would welcome additional military assistance from other countries.

Bush dismissed reporters' questions on whether his administration misled the American public about Iraq's possession of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons before the war. Months after taking control of Iraq, U.S. forces have been unable to find any concrete evidence that Saddam Hussein's government had an active program involving weapons of mass destruction.

"Saddam Hussein had a weapons program," Bush said. "Remember, he used them -- he used chemical weapons on his own people."

Though the United States has been unable to find Saddam, Bush said the dethroned leader no longer poses a threat to the United States, a measure of the mission's success even if the weapons have not been found.

"The man was a threat to America," Bush said. "He's not a threat today."

In Baghdad, the U.S. military said yesterday that an explosion that tore through a mosque in the restive town of Fallujah, killing an outspoken cleric and at least six of his students, appeared to be caused by an accident during a "bomb manufacturing class."

Many residents had blamed the blast Monday night on a U.S. missile or bomb -- a charge that U.S. forces flatly denied. In a statement, the U.S. Central Command said that U.S. forces and police in the city, about 35 miles west of Baghdad, had investigated the explosion at the Hassan mosque, a center of anti-occupation agitation in the city, and determined that the military was not responsible.

"The explosion was apparently related to a bomb manufacturing class that was being taught inside the mosque," it said.

 

Associated Press contributed to this report


Source

"Bring 'Em On?"
Jul 05, 2003

In 1970, when I arrived at my unit, Company A, 4th Battalion/503rd Infantry, 173rd Airborne Brigade, in what was then the Republic of Vietnam, I was charged up for a fight. I believed that if we didn't stop the communists in Vietnam, we'd eventually be fighting this global conspiracy in the streets of Hot Springs, Arkansas. I'd been toughened by Basic Training, Infantry Training and Parachute Training, taught how to use my weapons and equipment, and I was confident in my ability to vanquish the skinny unter-menschen. So I was dismayed when one of my new colleagues--a veteran who'd been there ten months--told me, "We are losing this war."

Not only that, he said, if I wanted to survive for my one year there, I had to understand one very basic thing. All Vietnamese were the enemy, and for us, the grunts on the ground, this was a race war. Within one month, it was apparent that everything he told me was true, and that every reason that was being given to the American public for the war was not true.

We had a battalion commander whom I never saw. He would fly over in a Loach helicopter and give cavalier instructions to do things like "take your unit 13 kilometers to the north." In the Central Highlands, 13 kilometers is something we had to hack out with machetes, in 98-degree heat, carrying sometimes 90 pounds over our body weights, over steep, slippery terrain. The battalion commander never picked up a machete as far as we knew, and after these directives he'd fly back to an air-conditioned headquarters in LZ English near Bong-son. We often fantasized together about shooting his helicopter down as a way of relieving our deep resentment against this faceless, starched and spit-shined despot.

Yesterday, when I read that US Commander-in-Chief George W. Bush, in a moment of blustering arm-chair machismo, sent a message to the 'non-existent' Iraqi guerrillas to "bring 'em on," the first image in my mind was a 20-year-old soldier in an ever-more-fragile marriage, who'd been away from home for 8 months. He participated in the initial invasion, and was told he'd be home for the 4th of July. He has a newfound familiarity with corpses, and everything he thought he knew last year is now under revision. He is sent out into the streets of Fallujah (or some other city), where he has already been shot at once or twice with automatic weapons or an RPG, and his nerves are raw. He is wearing Kevlar and ceramic body armor, a Kevlar helmet, a load carrying harness with ammunition, grenades, flex-cuffs, first-aid gear, water, and assorted other paraphernalia. His weapon weighs seven pounds, ten with a double magazine. His boots are bloused, and his long-sleeve shirt is buttoned at the wrist. It is between 100-110 degrees Fahrenheit at midday. He's been eating MRE's three times a day, when he has an appetite in this heat, and even his urine is beginning to smell like preservatives. Mosquitoes and sand flies plague him in the evenings, and he probably pulls a guard shift every night, never sleeping straight through. He and his comrades are beginning to get on each others' nerves. The rumors of 'going-home, not-going-home' are keeping him on an emotional roller coaster. Directives from on high are contradictory, confusing, and often stupid. The whole population seems hostile to him and he is developing a deep animosity for Iraq and all its people--as well as for official narratives.

This is the lad who will hear from someone that George W. Bush, dressed in a suit with a belly full of rich food, just hurled a manly taunt from a 72-degree studio at the 'non-existent' Iraqi resistance.

This de facto president is finally seeing his poll numbers fall. Even chauvinist paranoia has a half-life, it seems. His legitimacy is being eroded as even the mainstream press has discovered now that the pretext for the war was a lie. It may have been control over the oil, after all. Anti-war forces are regrouping as an anti-occupation movement. Now, exercising his one true talent--blundering--George W. Bush has begun the improbable process of alienating the very troops upon whom he depends to carry out the neo-con ambition of restructuring the world by arms.

Somewhere in Balad, or Fallujah, or Baghdad, there is a soldier telling a new replacement, "We are losing this war."

Stan Goff is the author of "Hideous Dream: A Soldier's Memoir of the US Invasion of Haiti" (Soft Skull Press, 2000) and of the upcoming book "Full Spectrum Disorder" (Soft Skull Press, 2003). He retired in 1996 from the US Army, from 3rd Special Forces. He lives in Raleigh.

He can be reached at: stan@ncwarn.org

 


Source

Bush to foes in Baghdad: 'Bring'em on!'

2003/7/3
WASHINGTON, Agencies

President George W. Bush vowed that strikes on U.S.-led forces in Iraq would not lead the United States to "leave prematurely" and defiantly challenged any foes in the war-torn nation to attack US troops.

"There are some who feel like that, you know, the conditions are such that they can attack us there. My answer is, bring'em on!," he said. "We've got the force necessary to deal with the security situation."

"There are some who feel like that if they attack us that we may decide to leave prematurely. They don't understand what they're talking about, if that's the case," he said in firm, almost angry tones.

"We've got plenty tough force there right now to make sure the situation is secure," he said, brushing aside critics who say the Pentagon underestimated the number of troops needed to rebuild Iraq and set it on track for a prosperous and democratic future.

Taking questions after a White House event, Bush said he would welcome any offers from other nations to contribute troops to the beleaguered US effort to build a prosperous and democratic Iraq.

"We always welcome help. We're always glad to include others," he said.

"But make no mistake about it, and the enemy shouldn't make any mistake about it, we will deal with them harshly if they continue to try to bring harm to the Iraqi people."

The president also gave a forceful defense of the Iraqi war. He rejected a question about whether there was a gap between what intelligence and administration officials reported as the threat from deposed President Saddam Hussein, and the scant evidence found so far of an Iraqi weapons program.

"Saddam Hussein had a weapons program," Bush said. "Remember he used them — he used chemical weapons on his own people."

Bush made no mention of the failure of U.S. teams to find evidence of weapons of mass destruction, but said, "We're bringing some order to the country and we're beginning to learn the truth."

Bush did not explicitly promise, as he has in the past, that weapons or evidence of a weapons program will be found. But, he said, "It's just a matter of time, a matter of time."

He also expressed impatience with the criticism leveled at his administration in recent weeks.

"See, we've been there for, what — I mean, how many days" Bush said. "Eighty, 90? Frankly, it wasn't all that long ago that we started military operations. And we got rid of him; much faster than a lot of people thought."

Bush also urged Liberian President Charles Taylor to leave the West African nation and said the United States was exploring all options to end the country's 14-year civil war.

"We are exploring all options as to how to keep the situation peaceful and stable," Bush told reporters at the White House. "One thing needs to happen. ... Mr. Taylor needs to leave the country."


Source


Friday, July 4, 2003

Bring ‘em on, but we need Indian troops!

From L K Sharma 
DH News Service WASHINGTON, July 3

The Iraq war is over but Iraq is still on US President Bush’s mind.
Responding to the regular trickle of unpleasant news from Iraq, he challenged the Iraqi fighters with the menacing expression: “Bring ‘em on”.
The Iraqis, still without a Dictionary of American slang, did not get it.

The US administration is frantically looking for Arabic speakers for its outreach campaign and it will help if President Bush picks up some Arabic phrases.
His domestic audience got the message and knew what exactly Mr Bush meant when he declared that US forces in Iraq are “plenty tough” in dealing with the attackers.

The Democrats got the message but did not like it. Even at the risk of being called cowards and unpatriotic, some of them criticised President Bush. One said Bush’s words were “tantamount to inciting and inviting more attacks against the US forces.”

Senator Frank Lautenberg said: “When I served in the army is Europe during World War II, I never heard any military commander — let alone a commander in chief — invite enemies to attack US troops.”

Another Democrat Congressman Richard Gephardt, a presidential candidate, said he had heard “enough of the phony, macho rhetoric” from Bush.
American Democrats worry about the content of Bush’s message but in England, they disapprove of the style of Bush’s speech. 

They were not amused when Bush said that Osama bin Laden was wanted “dead or alive” or that Saddam “crawfished” to escape UN sanctions.
The English linguistic sensibility was deeply hurt when Bush said he would smoke Taliban operatives out of their caves.

The Bush administration is not bothered about such niceties as it continues its global search for troops to assist its forces in Iraq. 

India, a non-aligned country with good relations with Arab nations and a first-rate professional army experienced in peacekeeping, remains a prime candidate.

The administration does not let go of any opportunity to drive the point home. Anybody from India will be involved in the issue of Indian troops for Iraq even if it was India’s family welfare minister visiting Washington today.

When Indian Foreign Secretary Kanwal Sibal came to Washington for a meeting on Indo-US high-technology trade, he found himself talking to National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, Deputy Secretaries of Defence and State, Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Armitage. Of course, he found enough time to do full justice to his mission on high technology trade.

It was the same issue at his meeting with the Washington Post editors and reporters where he reportedly said that the Government of India remained wary of sending troops to Iraq.

He said India wanted a better understanding of US plans for the Iraqi political system and improved security, and would prefer a larger UN role. 

He said it would be a “serious, serious departure” for Indian troops to serve under US command.

At his press conference, Mr Sibal had to deal with the issue of Indian troops even though his opening statement made no reference to it. He discussed frankly the pros and cons of sending Indian troops and highlighted the importance of a UN mandate for such a mission. He talked of ties with the US, India’s domestic compulsions, strategic imperatives, feedback from Iraq’s neighbours and the ground situation in Iraq.

In reply to a question, he said whatever be the Indian decision, the Indo-US relations would not suffer. The multi-faceted and mature relations were broad-based and had many equities, he said.

Any of Mr Sibbal’s predecessors would have spelt out in his sleep India’s position on an issue like this. But now, India has a new relationship with the US. Mr Sibal weighed his words and phrases with great care since for the pragmatic government back home, nothing is written in stone.

One is not sure after all the clarifications have been sought and secured from the US, what would the Indian government decide.

A noted American columnist, realising India’s difficulties, suggested that Mr Bush should do a deal and persuade the UN Secretary General Kofi Annan to take a “positive attitude toward India’s involvement in Iraq”.
India is among those countries who still attach importance to the United Nations.


Source

SUNDAY, JULY 6, 2003
THE TIMES OF INDIA

 

Bush invites ire for taunts to Iraqi fighters
CHIDANAND RAJGHATTA

TIMES NEWS NETWORK
[ THURSDAY, JULY 03, 2003 12:08:41 PM ]

WASHINGTON: US President George Bush stoked controversy at home on Wednesday by taunting Iraqi fighters to throw what they have at American troops while promising a harsh response even as India continued to seek clarifications from US officials about possible Indian troops deployment in Iraq. 

In language that echoed some of the slangy expressions he has used before, a testy Bush extended his hand and challenged "bring 'em on," while asserting that US forces in Iraq are "plenty tough" to deal with the persistent attacks that have claimed scores of American troops since the war ended.  

The Texan President has often used such colloquialisms, most notably when he said he wanted Osama bin Laden "dead or alive" and that he would "smoke the Taliban out of their caves."  

The latest display of machismo by the President set off a firestorm of rebuke, with some Democrats charging that he was inviting an attack on US troops.  

"I am shaking my head in disbelief," New Jersey Democrat Senator Frank Lautenberg said. "When I served in the Army in Europe during World War II, I never heard any military commander -- let alone the commander-in-chief -- invite enemies to attack US troops." Presidential candidate Richard Gephardt said he had heard "enough of the phony, macho rhetoric" from Bush. 

Meanwhile, India's Foreign Secretary Kanwal Sibal said here that, primarily, India is seeking a more explicit UN mandate and getting a feel of the ground situation in Iraq.  

Sibal told this to correspondents after some intense meetings with US interlocutors, including Deputy Secretaries of Defence and State, Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Armitage, and National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice.  

At the end of his visit, Sibal spoke with remarkable candour about the difficulties India faced in making the Iraq call. 

India, he said, had to weigh the strategic imperatives and its bilateral ties with Washington against the ground situation in Iraq and its domestic compulsions. 

"It is a question of judgment,” Sibal said, “There is no US pressure and there is no deadline.”  

While maintaining that the situation was still fluid and open, the foreign secretary however, appeared to be laying the groundwork for a possible rejection of the US request, saying a decision either way will not impact Indo-US ties.  

"Our relationship is multifaceted, broad-based and has many equities. There is maturity on all sides,” he said. 

It now appears India will make a call on Iraq deployment based on its own feedback from three quarters – from within Iraq, from the neighbouring countries, and from the domestic constituencies. 

[Karl Note:  The pacifists are in charge, and will have a committee vote on the issue!!  My God!]

The high level of exchanges between India and the US on the troops issue is indicative of the urgency in the administration in seeking additional support, despite President Bush’s bravado.  

US forces are stretched thin and are nervy in Iraq, and recent reports have shown some American soldiers openly questioning their presence there.  

The US has half its 10-division active duty troops in Iraq with another division in Afghanistan. Some 3-4 divisions are kept in reserve for contingencies and another 3-4 are in training at any given time. 

 On top of it all, there is now talk of sending US troops to the African outpost of Liberia, an abandoned US protectorate (freed American slaves were resettled there) where a virtual civil war has broken out.


Source

DodgeGlobe.com

Story last updated at 8:37 a.m. Saturday, July 5, 2003

Reagan: Stop trashing America
By Michael Reagan


They just never stop, this hate-America/hate George Bush crowd of sniveling liberals and Democrats frantically looking for ways to trash their country and tear down their president.

After having their anti-war predictions that the U.S. invasion of Iraq would be a disaster, with our troops facing months if not years of fighting desperate battles with Saddam's Republican Guard, the liberals' prediction got rubbed in their faces by our quick and almost bloodless victory. So they fell back to carp on the failure to unearth weapons of mass destruction and charged that President Bush had misled the nation about the existence of those weapons.

When that charge failed to register with the majority of Americans, they settled on bemoaning the current attacks on U.S. forces. The president, they now screech, had failed to make adequate plans to deal with the inevitable problems that would be involved in a post-war occupation.

When I was on Hannity and Colmes the other night, the liberals asked me, "Isn't it terrible imagery to have the United States military going door-to-door rousting out the Iraqis, looking for guns and throwing them out of their houses? Isn't that a terrible image for America?"

That was the first question. The last question was, "Michael, what do you think about the Rocket Propelled Grenades (RPGs) that are being shot at our vehicles ­ that every day there are soldiers dying? Don't we have any kind of strategy at all?"

They just don't understand that the reason why we're looking for weapons and rousting people out of their homes is to stop them from shooting and killing our soldiers.

The fact is, we are being shot at, people are killing us, and we need to go in and deal with the problem. Yet the Democrats went bonkers when President Bush said Wednesday that "Anybody who wants to harm American troops will be found and brought to justice. There are some that feel like if they attack us that we may decide to leave prematurely. They don't understand what they are talking about if that is the case. Let me finish. There are some who feel like the conditions are such that they can attack us there. My answer is: "Bring 'em on.""

The Democrats were aghast. Imagine, a U.S. President had talked tough.

When Rep. Richard Gephardt (D-Mo,) ­ who'd like to be president himself -- accused the president of using "phony, macho rhetoric," it reminded me of the weak-kneed Democrats who trembled with fear after my father, Ronald Reagan, acted "macho" when he told Gorbachev to tear down the Berlin Wall. If those squeamish liberals had been running things the wall would still be there and the Cold War would still be going on, and we'd probably be losing it.

I like what former Army officer Ralph Peters wrote in the New York Post the other day: "Our troops are doing remarkably well -- but the headlines make it sound like a disaster. Last weekend, almost as many Americans died in a residential balcony collapse in Chicago as have been killed by hostile fire in 'postwar' Iraq.

He asked, "How bad is it in Iraq?" It's terrible -- if you're a former Saddam loyalist, ex-secret policeman or Ba'ath Party muckety-muck on the wrong end of Operation Sidewinder. The party's over for Baghdad's bully-boys, and they don't much like it.

Nor, it appears, do America's liberal Democrats, who would like nothing better than to see us run out of Iraq so they could blame Bush.

Peters put it in perspective. "We shouldn't be surprised that the last embittered thugs are engaging in occasional acts of terrorism against us -- on the contrary, we should be relieved that we see so little continuing resistance. After toppling a totalitarian regime that ruled a population of 25 million for over a generation, it's amazing that we face only one or two attacks every few days. We could be suffering hundreds of incidents daily, if the population stood behind Saddam & Co.

"On our worst day last week, when two convoys came under attack, more than 600 other U.S. convoys didn't hear a single shot. Two patrols got into firefights. The other 500 patrols didn't even get hit with a water balloon."

Amen.

 

  • Mike Reagan, the eldest son of former President Ronald Reagan, is heard on more than 200 talk radio stations nationally as part of the Premiere Radio Network. Comments to mereagan@hotmail.com for Mike.

  •  

     

     

             
    Home Page Table Of Contents Discussion Threads Membership Copyright Notice